02/02/24 96 36.63 1 1
01/02/24 95.3 36.72 0 1
31/01/24 95.4 36.68 0 1
30/01/24 96.2 36.6 0 1
29/01/24 95.6 36.41 0 1
28/01/24 96.5 36.62 1 1
27/01/24 0 1
So, only six new data points since:
https://theheartattackdiet.substack.com/p/accidentally-testing-the-lipostat
But it looks to me like my weight is tracking back towards 95kg at a rate of around 0.5 kg/week, which is what it seems to do when I'm not doing anything odd and just living normally.
I think that's what I would have expected. You can temporarily make your weight go up by guzzling a load of alcohol and eating when you're not hungry, just like you can temporarily make it go down by starving yourself.
CICO is a law of physics.
But the homeostat that controls your weight will notice, and adjust your hunger to compensate, and as soon as you stop forcing it and eat according to hunger you'll track gently back to your set point.
CICO is a stupid plan.
It's also pretty clear that I've overshot my thyroid dose, I'm feeling bouncy and energetic and breaking into a sweat at the slightest exertion. Yesterday morning I got a waking temperature reading of 36.72.
Over many years I've learned that anything over 36.7 is usually a bad sign, because it seems to mean that my body is generating more heat than it can shed at night, and it goes with a risk of hypomanic behaviour and poor sleep.
I'm not going to call it yet. I want to see some more data points to confirm these first impressions, so I'll hold off my next mad diet experiment for another week or so, but I think both weight and necessary thyroid dose are now stable, with thyroid dose possibly on a long-term but very slow downward trend, and weight under homeostatic control with a set point of 95kg since last August.
These are both wonderful things! A year ago my weight was around 98kg and was rising inexorably, apparently 4kg/year and probably accelerating.
And my thyroid dose was at 1 grain NDT and 100ug T4 every day. In spite of that, my hypometabolic curse seemed to be returning, with tiredness and some of the early symptoms of hypometabolism coming back. And raising the dose didn't help, it just made me anxious and overheated without any benefit.
If that trend had continued, today I'd be at least 102kg, 'tired all the time', and likely on the path to poor general health and morbid obesity, as seems to be happening to increasing numbers of people in the West these days.
Today I feel well, I'm optimistic that I'll eventually be able to do without taking metabolic stimulants at all, and I'm no longer worried about my weight.
I am still very curious, and further weight loss would be a 'nice to have'.
But I think my problems are pretty much solved after about eight months of "no-PUFAs, no sulphites", or as u/exfatloss would describe it: "eating ad-lib high-protein swamp".
And I'm increasingly confident that the principal cause of all the unpleasantness that has affected me over the last decade or so is polyunsaturated fats, and that the good effects are mainly coming from slowly clearing the PUFAs stored in my adipose tissue.
There are still mysteries to explain. I am still curious. I am still confused.
> You can temporarily make your weight go up by guzzling a load of alcohol and eating when you're not hungry, just like you can temporarily make it go down by starving yourself.
> CICO is a law of physics.
I would argue that neither does B follow from A, nor does A follow from B. It's perfectly compatible with CICO if your weight does NOT go up even after guzzling a load of alcohol and eating when you're not hungry. It's also totally compatible with CICO if you starve yourself and your weight does not go down.
I'd argue you still have some metabolic problems if you aren't "magically and effortlessly" normal weight and able to stay there doing what you're doing currently.
But that might just entail doing this for the next 4-7 years, until all the PUFAs in your body's tissues are turned over, during which all related problems will slowly "magically" go away one by one.
Also, on your trend, it does seem to go down except for that last reading. I think you'd need more data points to tell. But it's definitely mostly looking good, maybe that last reading is just an outlier?